![]() ![]() I will likely maintain a subscription to DxO Optics Pro as I plan to make more use of it's features in favor of abandoning LR completely (which I had mostly used to "batch process" images). Photoshop also seems to be the only software that lets me process data in ON1, Topaz, and Nik Collection without the need of yet another saved intermediary.Įven though I still don't like the subscription model one bit (in particular the "pay in perpetuity" part) I grudgingly subscribed (especially after being prompted by my wife's refusal to give up photoshop after she had just gotten accustomed to working with it). The "import process" takes endlessly (import 7000 images from a vacation trip and be prepared to wait all day) and i don't like the proprietary "catalog" concept one bit (unfortunately DxO Optics and Capture One have it too but at least I can save processing parameters outside of them).ĪCR/photoshop seems to be the only combination that transfers images "seamlessly" without the need of an intermediate file that in the end either eats up storage space or needs to be removed manually. I had big hopes for LR (started with 4, upgraded to 5 and eventually 6, the perpetual license version) but I just can't warm up to the software. On1 RAW is fairly new and I stopped the evaluation when I realized how many things were missing I will pick this up soon after several updates have been made and a major one in the forecast. ![]() I purchased Capture One (for Sony) but have only very recently begun to use it to produce the files from my A7/A7II it's not clear to me yet that there is an advantage over using ACR despite what I read on the interwebs (I have V9 and have no plans to upgrade to the already available 10). DxO Optics Pro is the one software I already own for some time I don't use it routinely but it would have been top candidate had I actually abandoned acr/photoshop. Haven't warmed up to NX-D, mostly for lack of actually trying. At the time and on my computer, NX2 was always painfully slow and unstable it's now obsolete anyway unless you are willing to deal with the complications in a workflow that uses outdated software. I purchased the standalone version of LR, I dabbled in Capture NX2 and NX-D, DxO Optics Pro, Capture One (for Sony), and lately ON1 RAW (purchased the last three). You probably already figured that out though from my settings.īlackmagic's Free Davinci Resolve with whatever LUT's you want to use is getting pretty easy now.Ever since adobe came up with the subscription model have I been evaluating other software with regard to replacing acr/photoshop (which I've been using for about a decade now). With that said, I have broken down and started using LUT's and the like in Postprocessing. Been using Cinelike for my color settings. What I have been using lately is 30 FPS max, +1+1+0 on the sharpness / contrast / saturation settings, 100 ISO with 60 FPS shutter speed, and for white balance I let the machine decide for me and then I loc it in under custom, or I use Sunny or Cloudy default settings. I haven't fully tested this out yet to find the best settings to get rid of it yet though. When I put the Polar Pro filters on, I get motion blur instead of flicker. I took some video of some rocks and I can see it flicker, but I think it due to high shutter and high ISO. I think it is still there in the higher resolutions, but since the pixels are smaller, it doesn't jump out at you as much. Well, I think I see your flicker issue with high detail settings. ![]() Hey pal I remembered you try to avoid lots of post work on vids, mind sharing your settings bud ? Having a hard time getting decent results, think you said 1080p and not above 30fps ? What color settings you use if you don't mind me asking. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |